Modeling the Temporal Extent of Actions
By Scott Satkin, Martial Hebert. 2010
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Luc Van Gool
- Cordelia Schmid
- Li Fei-Fei
- Trevor Darrell
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Bernt Schiele
- Kristen Grauman
- Andrew Zisserman
In Biomedical Engineering
- Ashutosh Saxena
- Limin Wang
- Cordelia Schmid
- Mubarak Shah
- Yun Raymond Fu
- Kristen Grauman
- Hema Swetha Koppula
- Yu Kong
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Jitendra Malik
- Andrew Zisserman
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
- Cordelia Schmid
Citations in the corpus
- Video Representation Learning Using Discriminative Pooling (2018, background): “For example, Satkin and Hebert [35] explore the effect of temporal cropping of videos to regions of actions; however, assumes these regions are continuous.”
- Weakly-Supervised Alignment of Video with Text (2015, background): “Finally, as mentioned in [13, 41], it is difficult to define exactly when an action occurs.”
- Anticipating Human Activities Using Object Affordances for Reactive Robotic Response (2013, background): “It has been observed that temporal boundaries of actions are not precisely defined in practice, whether they are obtained automatically using weak-supervision [35] or by hand [36].”
- Advanced Structured Prediction (2014, background): “Error at the boundaries does not necessarily indicate the flaw of our method as human labels are often imperfect (Satkin and Hebert, 2010).”
- Leaving Some Stones Unturned: Dynamic Feature Prioritization for Activity Detection in Streaming Video (2016, background): “Common strategies are sliding temporal window search [24]–[26] or analyzing tracked objects [27]–[30].”
- Human Action Recognition and Prediction: A Survey (2018, background): “As shown in [17], [222], not all frames are equally important for action recognition; only few of them are critical.”
- Trespassing the Boundaries: Labeling Temporal Bounds for Object Interactions in Egocentric Video (2017, background): “Temporal Bounds in Non-Egocentric Datasets The leading work of Satkin and Hebert [24] first pointed out that determining the temporal extent of an action is often subjective, and that action recognition results vary depending on the bounds used for training.”
- Joint segmentation and classification of human actions in video (2011, background): “As a consequence, our results here are not directly comparable to some published numbers in the literature [12, 9, 20].”
- Max-Margin Early Event Detectors (2012, background): “To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper in the literature of computer vision that proposes a learning formulation for early event detection.”
- Spatiotemporal Deformable Part Models for Action Detection (2013, background): “2As observed by [19], the correlation between action type and duration can cause researchers to overestimate the accuracy of action recognition when testing on temporally segmented video, since features inadvertently encode duration.”
- High-level event recognition in unconstrained videos (2012, methodology): “Similar to the idea of sliding window search, Satkin and Hebert [120] located the best segment in a video for action training by exhaustively checking all possible segments of the video.”
- The THUMOS challenge on action recognition for videos "in the wild" (2016, unknown): “While elimination of temporal clutter simplifies the recognition problem, it becomes difficult to predict the performance of different methods in real applications.”
- Poselet Key-Framing: A Model for Human Activity Recognition (2013, background): “Key volumes: Recent video-based action recognition methods [12, 28] observed that limiting the bag of spatiotemporal interest point representation [9, 17] in a temporal segment boosts recognition performance.”
- Learning latent spatio-temporal compositional model for human action recognition (2013, background): “Some other researchers learned temporal structures for action recognition [29, 35].”
- Video Event Understanding Using Natural Language Descriptions (2013, background): “Weakly supervised action models Discriminative spatio temporal regions in videos or images to localize the actions in [27, 21, 28].”
- DISCOVER: Discovering Important Segments for Classification of Video Events and Recounting (2014, methodology): “[17] uses a simple algorithm to evaluate the quality of a possible cropping using other uncropped training data, the goal is to filter irrelevant segments from training dataset.”
- Learning latent temporal structure for complex event detection (2012, methodology): “Most similar to our method are recent works in video that learn discriminative models over temporal segments [12, 15, 16, 21].”
- Temporal Localization of Actions with Actoms (2013, unknown): “[4, 6, 7, 10–12 , 38– 45”
- UntrimmedNets for Weakly Supervised Action Recognition and Detection (2017, background): “More importantly, unlike object boundary, there is no precise definition about the exact temporal extent of actions [35, 36].”