Considerations on the spring analogy
By F. Blom. 2000
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d19e89614c067a465e91c3d3fe25a6b4c83076e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Computational Mechanics
- Christian B. Allen
- Thomas C. S. Rendall
- A. Michler
- Xueqiang Liu
- Hao Xia
- Ning Qin
- Daniel J. Poole
- A. Morris
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Fast dynamic grid deformation based on Delaunay graph mapping (2006, methodology): “A detailed analysis of the spring analogy is presented by Blom [9], demonstrating that the torsional spring is imperative to retain validity of a moving Navier–Stokes mesh.”
- Unified fluid–structure interpolation and mesh motion using radial basis functions (2008, background): “This was improved by Farhat et al. [36] to include a torsional spring to avoid the grid crossover problem, and in Blom [37] this torsional spring is shown to be essential for moving viscous meshes.”
- Aircraft control surface deflection using RBF‐based mesh deformation (2011, background): “modelling the edges as springs or as solid body elasticity (see [13, 21, 22] and [23, 24], respectively), interpolatory techniques rely only on point coordinates, which makes them less memory intensive.”