If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology

By Jillian C. Wallis, E. Rolando, Christine L. Borgman. PLoS ONE, 2013

455 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Research on practices to share and reuse data will inform the design of infrastructure to support data collection, management, and discovery in the long tail of science and technology. These are research domains in which data tend to be local in character, minimally structured, and minimally documented. We report on a ten-year study of the Center for Embedded Network Sensing (CENS), a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center. We found that CENS researchers are willing to share their data, but few are asked to do so, and in only a few domain areas do their funders or journals require them to deposit data. Few repositories exist to accept data in CENS research areas.. Data sharing tends to occur only through interpersonal exchanges. CENS researchers obtain data from repositories, and occasionally from registries and individuals, to provide context, calibration, or other forms of background for their studies. Neither CENS researchers nor those who request access to CENS data appear to use external data for primary research questions or for replication of studies. CENS researchers are willing to share data if they receive credit and retain first rights to publish their results. Practices of releasing, sharing, and reusing of data in CENS reaffirm the gift culture of scholarship, in which goods are bartered between trusted colleagues rather than treated as commodities.

Subfields: Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d12b00963aa6e0d9b9b84a62f0543de608fccb5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

  1. Bobby Lee Houtkoop
  2. T. Nichols
  3. D. Bishop
  4. M. Macleod
  5. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
  6. C. Chambers
  7. Anissa Tanweer
  8. Brittany Fiore-Gartland

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
  2. D. Bishop
  3. Bobby Lee Houtkoop
  4. T. Nichols
  5. M. Macleod
  6. C. Chambers
  7. Brittany Fiore-Gartland
  8. Anissa Tanweer

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Bobby Lee Houtkoop
  2. T. Nichols
  3. D. Bishop
  4. M. Macleod
  5. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
  6. C. Chambers
  7. Anissa Tanweer
  8. Brittany Fiore-Gartland

Citations in the corpus