Counting Nodal Lines Which Touch the Boundary of an Analytic Domain
By J. Toth, Steve Zelditch. 2007
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We consider the zeros on the boundary $\partial \Omega$ of a Neumann eigenfunction $\phi_{\lambda}$ of a real analytic plane domain $\Omega$. We prove that the number of its boundary zeros is $O (\lambda)$ where $-\Delta \phi_{\lambda} = \lambda^2 \phi_{\lambda}$. We also prove that the number of boundary critical points of either a Neumann or Dirichlet eigenfunction is $O(\lambda)$. It follows that the number of nodal lines of $\phi_{\lambda}$ (components of the nodal set) which touch the boundary is of order $\lambda$. This upper bound is of the same order of magnitude as the length of the total nodal line, but is the square root of the Courant bound on the number of nodal components in the interior. More generally, the results are proved for piecewise analytic domains.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d00b69e2b9db63e8dcb2cc72d094c2e565fefa1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Geometry and Topology
- A. Reznikov
- Amit Ghosh
- Peter Sarnak
- P. Michel
- Alex Kontorovich
- V. Blomer
- Gergely Harcos
- Kannan Soundararajan
Citations in the corpus
- Nodal Domains of Maass Forms I (2012, background): “s ‚` !1 Nin(`‚)À" ‚ 1 27 ¡" ` , for any "¨0. The implied constant depends only on ", X and . Remark 1.5. (a). As noted in I, this lower bound is no doubt far from the truth. From [TZ09] it follows that Nin(`‚) ¿‚ 1 2 ` and this upper bound is probably sharp. As far as split nodal”