Tree diversity analysis: a manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies

1,195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biotic homogenization at the community scale: disentangling the roles of urbanization and plant invasion (2013, methodology): “We computed the reciprocal value of the Simpson index, as suggested by Kindt & Coe (2005) for biological communities with low diversity, and the Shannon evenness index.”
Influence of corn, switchgrass, and prairie cropping systems on soil microbial communities in the upper Midwest of the United States (2016, methodology): “R’s ordiequilibriumcircle function (Kindt & Coe, 2005), and indicator group analysis (Dufrene & Legendre, 1997) was used to identify OTUs whose occurrences were linked to specific crop types using labdsv’s indval function (Roberts, 2012) and the package QVALUE (Dabney et al., 2012) to assign…”
Does pollen-assemblage richness reflect floristic richness? A review of recent developments and future challenges (2016, unknown): “…839 within modern assemblages from different vegetation or habitat types or geographical areas (e.g. 840 Ricotta et al., 2002; Magurran, 2004; Kindt and Coe, 2005; Kindt, 2014; Terlizzi et al., 2014) and to 841 compare richness, evenness, and diversity properties of different assemblages…”