Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach

By R. Bhagwat, M. K. Sharma. Computers & industrial engineering, 2007

806 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cf81e5e7bec215221af94d1665581a62243b106

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Ki‐Hoon Lee
2. Vieri Maestrini
3. Yong Wu
4. Federico Caniato
5. Davide Luzzini
6. Paolo Maccarrone
7. Nopadol Rompho

Citations in the corpus

• Why the Balanced Scorecard Fails in SMEs: A Case Study (2011, result): “There are also several studies reporting the use of this technique in SMEs (for example Hvolby and Thorstensen, 2000; Tenhunen et al 2001; Fernandes et al 2006; Bhagwat and Sharma, 2007; Manville, 2007).”
• Integrating sustainability performance measurement into logistics and supply networks: A multi-methodological approach (2014, methodology): “In a similar vein, Bhagwat and Sharma (2007) find that there is a lack of understanding of the number of performance measurement metrics, as well as lack of clear distinction between metrics at strategic, tactical and operational levels.”
• Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda (2017, methodology): “The reported benefits include: (1) support for the implementation of the SC strategy (Gunasekaran et al., 2004; Bhagwat and Sharma, 2009); (2) empowerment of decision-making capabilities by focusing on metrics that really matter, avoiding information overloading (Kocaoğlu et al., 2011); (3) a…”