A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants

By B. M. Larson, S. Barrett. 2000

684 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cf4110a99c82a75ffad0c189ff4a5a9a3c529a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Reduced reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herb Phyteuma spicatum (2005, background): “Following Larson & Barrett (2000), the index was calculated as L = 1 − ( P o / P s ), where P o is the mean number of seeds produced per capsule or plant for open-pollinated controls and P s is the equivalent mean measure for plants that received supplemental hand-pollination.”
Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation (2010, background): “The PL index ranges from 0, no pollen limitation, to 1, the highest pollen limitation (Larson & Barrett 2000).”
Density‐dependent pollen limitation and reproductive assurance in a wind‐pollinated herb with contrasting sexual systems (2011, background): “…limitation occurs more commonly in self-incompatible hermaphroditic populations or in populations with imperfect flowers, i.e. flowers that are either male or female (Larson & Barrett 2000; Knight et al. 2005), because the imposed separation of the sex roles precludes autonomous self-pollination.”
Breeding systems of invasive alien plants in South Africa: does Baker's rule apply? (2004, background): “However, due to an additional source of pollen from the same plant, capacity for self fertilization may alleviate pollen limitation in long-lived plants (Larson & Barrett, 2000).”
Effects of grazing intensity on pollinator abundance and diversity, and on pollination services (2016, methodology): “Pollen limitation indices were calculated for each site as 1− (U/S), where U is the number of fertile seeds in the unmanipulated flowers and S the number of fertile seeds in the supplementary pollinated flowers (Larson & Barrett, 2000).”
Pollinator visitation, stigmatic pollen loads and among‐population variation in seed set in Lythrum salicaria (2004, methodology): “…populations where supplemental hand-pollinations were performed, we calculated, for each population and year, a pollen limitation index proposed by Larson & Barrett (2000): L = 1 – ( P o / P s ), where P o in this study is the number of seeds produced by open-pollinated controls and P s is the…”
The Evolutionary Enigma of Mixed Mating Systems in Plants: Occurrence, Theoretical Explanations, and Empirical Evidence (2005, background): “…Dole 1992, Rathcke & Real 1993; see also Lloyd & Schoen 1992), reduced pollen limitation in selfing relative to outcrossing populations or species (Goodwillie 2001, Kasagi & Kudo 2003, Larson & Barrett 2000) and low rates of cross-pollination (Burd 1994, Fausto et al. 2001, Ramsey & Vaughton 1996).”
Pollination efficiency of wild bees and hoverflies provided to oilseed rape (2012, background): “As soon as the flowers appear on a plant, pollinators considerably influence reproductive processes at the single-flower level, both in wild plants (Larson & Barrett, 2000) and crop plants (Bos et al., 2007).”