Dispersal and metapopulation dynamics of an oceanic seabird, the wandering albatross, and its consequences for its response to long‐line fisheries

By P. Inchausti, Henri Weimerskirch. 2002

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cf191b376fe04603c25df73a6874bd3ade40c99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Identification of high‐use habitat and threats to leatherback sea turtles in northern waters: new directions for conservation (2005, background): “Movement data have had important implications for predicting how threats may impact upon populations and meta-populations of bluefin tuna (Block et al. 2001), wandering albatross ( Inchausti & Weimerskirch 2002 ), South American fur seals (Thompson et al. 2003) and Florida panthers (Maehr et al. 200”
Postnatal dispersal of wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans: implications for the conservation of the species (2006, background): “Their ability to always return to their birthplace after years of immaturity on the open ocean ( Inchausti and Weimerskirch 2002 ) indicates an innate mechanism for navigation over long distances of open waters.”
Relative influence of fisheries and climate on the demography of four albatross species (2010, background): “Thus, true survival probability could have been slightly underestimated due to some emigration, as dispersal have been reported in wandering albatross (Inchausti & Weimerskirch, 2002) and yellow-nosed albatross (Rolland et al., 2009) colonies.”
Population sex ratio variation in a monogamous long‐lived bird, the wandering albatross (2005, background): “…sex-biased dispersal because (i) of the strong philopatry of juveniles to the natal island (99·3% of birds return to their natal island, sex pooled; Inchausti & Weimerskirch 2002), and because (ii) females tend to disperse more than males (89·1% of males returned to their birth colony, whereas…”
Making protected area networks effective for marine top predators (2011, background): “…species (Luthin 1987, Shimazaki et al. 2004, White 2009, Rabinowitz & Zeller 2010), its application in the marine 204 Hooker et al.: MPAs for marine top predators environment is a work in progress (Inchausti & Weimerskirch 2002, Wilson et al. 2004, Hawkes et al. 2006, Shillinger et al. 2008).”