Bouguer reduction density, why 2.67?

By W. Hinze. 2003

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cea3f3172551f47efbdb49da0910e6ef459ee26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Aiken
2. J. Brozena
3. B. Coakley
4. D. Dater
5. G. Flanagan
6. R. Forsberg
7. T. Hildenbrand
8. G. Keller

Citations in the corpus

• New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database (2005, background): “In the future, as more definitive information is obtained on the density of solid-earth materials subjacent to gravity stations, it may be desirable to use a density appropriate for the station location rather than the 2670 kg/m3 average value (Hackney and Featherstone, 2003; Hinze, 2003).”