The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation

By G. Majone. 2000

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cdf1c37684e8e6d080d71e7be5562f6666cb9f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Credibility, Complexity and Uncertainty: Explaining the Institutional Independence of 29 EU Agencies (2010, background): “…find a reference to ‘functionalism’ which – in this context – posits ‘institutional choices are explained in terms of the functions that a given institution is expected to perform, and the effects on policy outcomes it is expected to produce’ (Pollack 2006: 167; see also Majone 1996, 2000).”
Organizations, Regulation, and Economic Behavior: Regulatory Dynamics and Forms from the Nineteenth to Twenty-First Century (2008, background): “Finally, imageries of regulation-forcompetition emphasize its multilevel character, reflecting how states and market making are increasingly embedded in transnational systems (Humphreys & Padgett 2006, Jordana et al. 2006, Majone 2000).”
Legitimacy and/or policy effectiveness?: network governance and GMO regulation in the European Union (2003, background): “…examples of member states’ non-compliance with EU-level decisions, notably regarding food safety legislation and the regulation of GMOs and their products, provide evidence of the EU’s weakened legitimacy, and the inadequacy and insufficiency of output legitimacy in particular (Majone 2000).”
A vote for the President? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections (2014, background): “…through mechanisms of democratic input, such as mechanisms of accountability (e.g., Føllesdal and Hix 2006; Habermas 2012; Hix 2008) and those who argue that the EU should be legitimated through its performance, by providing solutions to common problems (e.g., Majone 1998, 2000; Scharpf 1999).”
Beyond delegation: transnational regulatory regimes and the eu regulatory state (2005, background): “The decisive advantage of these regulatory networks or fora is that they are able to remove the deficits of too much decentralization, without simultaneously being dependent on formal centralization (cf. Dehousse 1997; Coen and Doyle 2000; Eberlein and Grande 2000; Majone 2000).”
Principals, agents, and the implementation of EU cohesion policy (2005, background): “These agencies are said to increase policy efficiency – provided that they have a legal mandate to pursue their goals (see e.g. Majone 2000: 290–3).”
Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy in the European Union (2012, background): “Indeed, much of the debate on how to ‘fix’ the democratic deficit in the EU has focused on whether to strengthen the procedural (input) aspects of democracy by, say, giving more powers to the EP (see, for example, Lord and Magnette, 2004; Hix, 2008), or by enhancing the output legitimacy by, say, im”