On the time dependence of holographic complexity

By Dean Carmi, Shira Chapman, H. Marrochio, R. Myers, Sotaro Sugishita. 2017

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A bstractWe evaluate the full time dependence of holographic complexity in various eternal black hole backgrounds using both the complexity=action (CA) and the complexity=volume (CV) conjectures. We conclude using the CV conjecture that the rate of change of complexity is a monotonically increasing function of time, which saturates from below to a positive constant in the late time limit. Using the CA conjecture for uncharged black holes, the holographic complexity remains constant for an initial period, then briefly decreases but quickly begins to increase. As observed previously, at late times, the rate of growth of the complexity approaches a constant, which may be associated with Lloyd’s bound on the rate of computation. However, we find that this late time limit is approached from above, thus violating the bound. For either conjecture, we find that the late time limit for the rate of change of complexity is saturated at times of the order of the inverse temperature. Adding a charge to the eternal black holes washes out the early time behaviour, i.e. complexity immediately begins increasing with sufficient charge, but the late time behaviour is essentially the same as in the neutral case. We also evaluate the complexity of formation for charged black holes and find that it is divergent for extremal black holes, implying that the states at finite chemical potential and zero temperature are infinitely more complex than their finite temperature counterparts.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ccb38dde320fd1002314bbe6221c6fdd2d771cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Shira Chapman
  2. H. Marrochio
  3. R. Myers
  4. Ro Jefferson
  5. Lucas Hackl
  6. M. Heller
  7. Jens Eisert
  8. Yoshinori Matsuo

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. R. Myers
  2. Shira Chapman
  3. H. Marrochio
  4. Ro Jefferson
  5. Lucas Hackl
  6. M. Heller
  7. Jens Eisert
  8. Yoshinori Matsuo

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Shira Chapman
  2. H. Marrochio
  3. R. Myers
  4. Ro Jefferson
  5. Lucas Hackl
  6. M. Heller
  7. Norihiro Iizuka
  8. K. Hashimoto

Citations in the corpus