Estimation of Shark Home Ranges using Passive Monitoring Techniques
By M. Heupel, C. Simpfendorfer, R. Hueter. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2004
224 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cca054afa252ce4ae48b9d07fe631374178ee6a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Christopher G. Lowe
- M. Heupel
- C. Simpfendorfer
- J. Caselle
- Y. Papastamatiou
- Darin T. Topping
- M. Espinoza
- I. Field
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- C. Simpfendorfer
- M. Heupel
- Corey J. A. Bradshaw
- Christopher G. Lowe
- M. Meekan
- I. Field
- C. Speed
- M. Espinoza
Citations in the corpus
- Multi-scale patterns of habitat use in a highly mobile reef fish, the white trevally Pseudocaranx dentex, and their implications for marine reserve design (2009, background): “…comparable to the HRs of other reef predators with pelagic or bentho-pelagic behaviours that have been inferred or suggested from long-term studies using passive acoustics, such as the HRs for some carangids and lutjanids (e.g. Meyer et al. 2007a,b) or even some coastal sharks (Heupel et al. 2004).”
- Site fidelity and seasonal movement patterns of adult California sheephead Semicossyphus pulcher (Labridae) : an acoustic monitoring study (2006, methodology): “…patterns, with results becoming comparable to those obtained via laborious manual telemetry or via expensive high-resolution radio-acoustic positioning and telemetry (VRAP) methods (Bradbury et al. 1995, O’Dor et al. 2002, Simpfendorfer et al. 2002, Parsons et al. 2003, Heupel et al. 2004, 2006).”
- Sharks in nearshore environments: models, importance, and consequences (2010, background): “…Springer’s model population, juveniles remain within nursery areas for extended lengths of time while using restricted areas of space and displaying high degrees of site attachment to nearshore habitat (e.g. Morrissey & Gruber 1993a, Merson & Pratt 2001, Heupel et al. 2004, DeAngelis et al. 2008).”
- Long-term movement patterns and trophic ecology of blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) at Palmyra Atoll (2010, background): “However, the establishment of effective MPAs requires a detailed understanding of predator movement patterns and how these vary seasonally and with habitat (e.g. Heupel et al., 2004; Meyer et al., 2007; Papastamatiou et al., 2009a).”
- First characterization of shark nursery habitat in the United States Virgin Islands: evidence of habitat partitioning by two shark species (2008, background): “These observations are consistent with those of Heupel et al. (2004), who suggested that young blacktip sharks maintain a core refuge area to avoid predation, but make excursions outside that area, possibly to feed.”
- Ontogenetic shifts in movement and habitat use of juvenile pigeye sharks Carcharhinus amboinensis in a tropical nearshore region (2011, background): “Previous research has found that home ranges of young sharks increase in size over time (Heupel et al. 2004) and that segregation may occur between different age classes of juveniles (Simpfendorfer et al. 2005).”
- Social behaviour in sharks and rays: analysis, patterns and implications for conservation (2012, methodology): “…likely to offer high levels of prey diversity and abundance for elasmobranch predators, and consequently, many species periodically return inshore to forage and/or breed, permitting juveniles a greater chance of survival in the shallow, sheltered waters (Heupel et al. 2004; Chapman et al. 2009).”
- Residence and movement patterns of cownose rays Rhinoptera bonasus within a south‐west Florida estuary (2007, background): “The advent of passive acoustic monitoring technology has allowed the movements of multiple animals to be continuously tracked over extended time frames (Klimley et al., 1988; Meyer et al., 2000; Heupel & Hueter, 2001; Voegeli et al., 2001; Heupel et al., 2004) permitting predictions regarding long-t”
- Quantifying movement patterns for shark conservation at remote coral atolls in the Indian Ocean (2011, background): “Knowledge of the extent of movements and the degree of site fidelity of sharks are essential for appropriate management and conservation (Heupel et al. 2004;Heupel and Simpfendorfer 2005; Field et al. 2009a; Speed et al. 2010), and without this information, protection strategies could be imposed…”
- Residency patterns and movements of grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) in semi-isolated coral reef habitats (2015, background): “Conversely, while movements and dispersal to nearby, contiguous habitats may be an option for many similar-sized coastal shark species (Rechisky and Wetherbee 2003; Heupel et al. 2004; Knip et al. 2012a), reef sharks occurring offshore may maximize their fitness and survival by adapting to a wider r”
- Complexities of coastal shark movements and their implications for management (2010, background): “Similarly, juvenile blacktip sharks expand their home range over months due to changes in environmental conditions or ontogenetic changes in behaviour (Heupel & Hueter 2001, Heupel et al. 2004, Heupel & Simpfendorfer 2005a).”