Cloud pressure retrieval using the O2‐O2 absorption band at 477 nm
By Juan Ramon Acarreta, J. D. Haan, Piet Stammes. 2004
241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cc67ed6053ff92ed17c12922b0d1e966b82f578
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Pieternel F. Levelt
- Pawan K. Bhartia
- Ping Wang
- Piet Stammes
- J. Pepijn Veefkind
- Maarten Sneep
- Kelly Chance
- J. D. Haan
In Global and Planetary Change
- Pieternel F. Levelt
- Pawan K. Bhartia
- Ping Wang
- Piet Stammes
- J. Pepijn Veefkind
- Maarten Sneep
- Kelly Chance
- J. D. Haan
Citations in the corpus
- Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument (2006, background): “cloud information includes both the effective cloud coverage and effective cloud pressure, which employs absorption by O -O [22] and the rotational Raman scattering [23].”
- Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Theoretical framework and validation (2008, methodology): “In order to guide users, a summary of the validation status of effective cloud fraction and cloud pressure from the OMCLDO2 and OMCLDRR cloud products is presented.”
- Retrieval of large volcanic SO2 columns from the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Comparison and limitations (2007, methodology): “Fortunately, cloud pressures consistent with the MLER model are being retrieved from OMI using approaches based on RRS [Joiner et al., 2004, 2006; Vasilkov et al., 2004] or absorption in the O2 O2 band near 477 nm [Acarreta et al., 2004].”
- Updated Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Ozone Monitoring Instrument (SAO OMI) formaldehyde retrieval (2015, methodology): “Acarreta et al. (2004) estimated the systematic uncertainty of the cloud fraction to be ±0.1.”