Equivariant moduli problems, branched manifolds, and the Euler class
By Kai Cieliebak, I. M. I. Riera, Dietmar Salamon. 2003
55 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The purpose of this paper is to explain the equivariant Euler class associated to an oriented G-equivariant Fredholm section S : B → E of a Hilbert space bundle over a Hilbert manifold. The key hypotheses are that the Lie group G is compact, the isotropy subgroups are finite, and the zero set of the section is compact. The present paper is motivated by our joint work with Gaio [9] on invariants of Hamiltonian group actions. In this work the Fredholm section arises from a version of the vortex equations, where the target space is a symplectic manifold with a Hamiltonian G-action [8, 19, 20]. In many interesting cases the resulting moduli spaces are compact and so the results of the present paper can be applied. Other examples of Fredholm sections with compact zero sets are the Seiberg–Witten equations over a four-manifold [25] or the harmonic map equations when the target space is a negatively curved manifold (see e.g. [14]). This is in sharp contrast to the Gromov–Witten invariants of general (compact) symplectic manifolds [11, 16, 17, 22] and to the Donaldson invariants of smooth four-manifolds [10], where the moduli spaces are noncompact and the compactifications are the source of some major difficulties of the theory. Since the unperturbed moduli space is compact, our framework is considerably simpler than the one required for the construction of the Gromov–Witten invariants. Our exposition follows closely the work of Li–Robbin–Ruan [16]. In the case G = {1l} similar results were proved in [6, 12, 21]. In [12] Fulton proved that, if B is a finite dimensional complex manifold, E → B is a holomorphic vector bundle, and S : B → E is a holomorphic section, then the zero set M := S−1(0) carries a fundamental cycle (in singular homology) which is Poincare dual to the Euler class. This was extended to the infinite ∗Supported by National Science Foundation grant DMS-0072267
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cb626b3fcffb487c576f4377d2f40324b311f15
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- Michael Hutchings
- Michael C. Sullivan
- K. Wysocki
- E. Zehnder
- Helmut Hofer
- T. Ekholm
- Richard Siefring
- Clifford H. Taubes
In Mathematical Physics
- Michael Hutchings
- K. Wysocki
- E. Zehnder
- Helmut Hofer
- Michael C. Sullivan
- T. Ekholm
- Clifford H. Taubes
- Frederick J. Bourgeois III
Citations in the corpus
- A general Fredholm theory III: Fredholm functors and polyfolds (2008, background): “Our paper extends some of the ideas from Cieliebak, Mundet i Riera and Salamon [2] to the functorial setting and it is also related to the recent work by McDuff [26].”
- Integration theory on the zero sets of polyfold Fredholm sections (2007, methodology): “[2], where solution sets of Fredholm problems equivariant with respect to a global group action are considered.”
- The periodic Floer homology of a Dehn twist. (2004, background): “se PFH index agrees with the Morse index. Index 1 flow lines not of this form may exist for (φf,J0), but S1 acts nontrivially on their moduli spaces, so by virtual cycle machinery as developed e.g. in [2, 7], the mod 2 count of such bad flow lines is zero after perturbing J0 to our generic almost comp”