The Information Paradox for Black Holes.

By S. Hawking. 2015

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

I propose that the information loss paradox can be resolved by considering the supertranslation of the horizon caused by the ingoing particles. Information can be recovered in principle, but it is lost for all practical purposes.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cacaf939b003ef00278f6518a35ccee0780ac48

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. L. Donnay
2. G. Giribet
3. M. Pino
4. H. Gonz'alez
5. Rafael A. Porto
6. G. Kalin
7. L. Senatore
8. J. Steinhoff

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. L. Donnay
2. G. Giribet
3. M. Pino
4. H. Gonz'alez
5. Rafael A. Porto
6. G. Kalin
7. L. Senatore
8. J. Steinhoff

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. L. Donnay
2. G. Giribet
3. M. Pino
4. H. Gonz'alez
5. Rafael A. Porto
6. Charles Marteau

Citations in the corpus

• Extended symmetries at the black hole horizon (2016, background): “This is mainly motivated by the proposal in [1, 2].”
• The Effective Field Theorist's Approach to Gravitational Dynamics (2016, result): “y [400], (non-violent) non-locality [449{452], or the ‘corpuscular’ framework [453{456]. Moreover, the recent results associated with the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs (or BMS) group may not be unrelated, e.g. [402,456,457], due to the {conjectured{ presence of ‘soft hair’, e.g. [458,459]. In light of all of ”