Image Forgery Detection Using Adaptive Oversegmentation and Feature Point Matching
By Chi-Man Pun, Xiaochen Yuan, Xiu-Li Bi. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2015
298 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biophysics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ca44e4538864fbe41f9ccde62651d96ea46a58c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biophysics
- Premkumar Natarajan
- Yue Wu
- Wael Abd-Almageed
- Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury
- Lakshmanan Nataraj
- Jawadul H. Bappy
- Bangalore S. Manjunath
- Luisa Verdoliva
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Premkumar Natarajan
- Yue Wu
- Wael Abd-Almageed
- Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury
- Lakshmanan Nataraj
- Jawadul H. Bappy
- Cody Simons
- Bangalore S. Manjunath
In Media Technology
- Premkumar Natarajan
- Yue Wu
- Wael Abd-Almageed
- Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury
- Lakshmanan Nataraj
- Jawadul H. Bappy
- Bangalore S. Manjunath
- Luisa Verdoliva
Citations in the corpus
- Hybrid LSTM and Encoder–Decoder Architecture for Detection of Image Forgeries (2019, background): “Over the past decades, there have been many works to classify image manipulation, i.e., whether an image is tampered or not [13], [30], [39], [47], [65], [74], [78].”
- BusterNet: Detecting Copy-Move Image Forgery with Source/Target Localization (2018, background): “Copy-move detection frameworks can be broadly classified, based on the underlying feature extraction and subsequent matching schemes, into three main categories: patch/block-based methods such as chroma features [4,9], PCA feature [14], Zernike moments [26], blur moments [20], DCT [21]; keypoint-bas”