Detecting dependence between marks and locations of marked point processes

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Geostatistical inference under preferential sampling (2010, methodology): “…, x + h ∈ P ]. on x h is Under the null hypothesis that sampling is non-prefer-ential, the + ∈ P irrelevant; hence M k .h/ is a constant. statistics the Schlather et al. (2004) proposed as test empirical counterparts of M 1 .h/ and M 2 .h/ , and implemented the resulting tests by comparing the…”
A Nonparametric Test for Spatial Isotropy Using Subsampling (2004, background): “This assumption can be evaluated (see Schlather, Ribeiro, and Diggle 2004).”
Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes * (2007, methodology): “Other approaches for obtaining estimating equations for spatial point process models are studied in Takacs (1986) and Baddeley (2000).”
Dismantling the Mantel tests (2011, methodology): “He concluded his article by claiming that this method was general - a claim later relayed by Sokal (1979) - and could be used whenever one has to assess the significance of the correlation between the entries of two square matrices containing “distances” relative to pairs of individuals.”
Scale-dependent competition at the stand level assessed from crown areas (2008, background): “A more promising approach in such competition analyses is to complement tree position by quantitative size attributes (continuous marks), i.e. to use marked point patterns (Parrott and Lange, 2004; Schlather et al., 2004).”