Finite-time blowup and global-in-time unbounded solutions to a parabolic–parabolic quasilinear Keller–Segel system in higher dimensions
By Tomasz Cie'slak, Christian Stinner. 2011
337 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract In this paper we consider quasilinear Keller–Segel type systems of two kinds in higher dimensions. In the case of a nonlinear diffusion system we prove an optimal (with respect to possible nonlinear diffusions generating explosion in finite time of solutions) finite-time blowup result. In the case of a cross-diffusion system we give results which are optimal provided one assumes some proper non-decay of a nonlinear chemical sensitivity. Moreover, we show that once we do not assume the above mentioned non-decay, our result cannot be as strong as in the case of nonlinear diffusion without nonlinear cross-diffusion terms. To this end we provide an example, interesting by itself, of global-in-time unbounded solutions to the nonlinear cross-diffusion Keller–Segel system with chemical sensitivity decaying fast enough, in a range of parameters in which there is a finite-time blowup result in a corresponding case without nonlinear cross-diffusion.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Modeling and Simulation, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c506ba36435c765d42b4bcc0dcb8519943b86ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
- Michael Winkler
- Tian Xiang
- Zhaoyin Xiang
- Yulan Wang
- Xinru Cao
- Youshan Tao
- Yingping Peng
- Sining Zheng
In Modeling and Simulation
- Michael Winkler
- Tian Xiang
- Zhaoyin Xiang
- Yulan Wang
- Xinru Cao
- Johannes Lankeit
- Youshan Tao
- Yingping Peng
In Molecular Biology
- Michael Winkler
- Tian Xiang
- Zhaoyin Xiang
- Yulan Wang
- Xinru Cao
- Youshan Tao
- Sining Zheng
- Yingping Peng
Citations in the corpus
- Delayed blow‐up for chemotaxis models with local sensing (2020, background): “For instance, in [7, 8], the first equation is nonlinear in u and linear in v; that is, the motility and the chemosensitivity are densitydependent (but independent on the chemical concentration), which models a volume-filling effect.”
- Effects of signal-dependent motilities in a Keller–Segel-type reaction–diffusion system (2017, background): “For instance, quite a comprehensive understanding could be achieved in the case when D = D(u) > 0 and χ = χ(u) ≥ 0 are suitably smooth, independent of the signal concentration v = v(x, t) and exclusively depending on the population density u = u(x, t): Then, namely, known results indicate that essen”
- Global classical solutions in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with subcritical sensitivity (2018, background): “6) then some solutions may become unbounded ([51], [24]), where in some particular cases and related systems involving nonlinear diffusion, such unboundedness phenomena are even known to occur within finite time ([8], [9]; cf.”
- Boundedness in a quasilinear fully parabolic Keller-Segel system of higher dimension with logistic source (2015, background): “Namely, if q − p < 2 n , then all solutions are global and uniformly bounded [24, 18]; however, if q− p > 2 n , unbounded solutions do exist [22], even finite-time blow-up may occur under some additional conditions n ≥ 3 and q ≥ 1 [4, 24].”
- New critical exponents in a fully parabolic quasilinear Keller–Segel system and applications to volume filling models (2014, methodology): “14) only the second one requires a more detailed treatment than in [6].”
- Global existence of solutions and uniform persistence of a diffusive predator-prey model with prey-taxis ✩ (2016, background): “Global existence, boundedness or blowup of solutions in more general quasilinear parabolic– parabolic chemotaxis systems with nonlinear sensitivity functions and source term have been studied extensively, see for example, [11,12,25,26,34,44,48,49,59,61,62].”
- Global existence and boundedness in a 3D Keller–Segel–Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion and rotational flux (2017, background): “3) admits the blow-up solutions under some technical assumptions (see [7, 18, 20,22,27,28] and references therein).”