The potential impact of modern biotechnology on fish aquaculture

By P. Melamed, Z. Gong, G. Fletcher, C. Hew. 2002

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Genetics, Immunology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c480c15302b57019a977a622da99f27d5aa888e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. A. Buschmann
2. C. Yarish
3. T. Chopin
4. A. Neori
5. Jonathan Moorhead
6. M. Troell
7. Chaoshu Zeng
8. Rosamond L. Naylor

In Genetics

1. Chaoshu Zeng
2. Jonathan Moorhead

In Immunology

1. A. Buschmann
2. A. Neori
3. Chaoshu Zeng
4. Jonathan Moorhead
5. J. Olafsen

Citations in the corpus

• Integrated mariculture: asking the right questions (2003, background): “Some argue that further increases in aquaculture production will come mainly from further investment in biotechnology (Hardy, 1999; Hew and Fletcher, 2001; Melamed et al., 2002), including technologies ranging from protein expression and DNA vaccines (and chips) to transgenic technologies.”
• Development of Captive Breeding Techniques for Marine Ornamental Fish: A Review (2010, methodology): “The main areas that often encompass broodstock husbandry and reproductive manipulation are the control of environment, diets and feeding, the direct administration of reproductive hormones, and in some cases, invasive stripping techniques (Coward et al., 2002; Melamed et al., 2002).”