The rotation curves shapes of late-type dwarf galaxies

By R. Swaters, R. Sancisi, T. S. Albada, van der Thijs Hulst. 2009

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present rotation curves derived from H i observations for a sample of 62 galaxies that have been observed as part of the Westerbork H i Survey of Spiral and Irregular Galaxies (WHISP) project. These rotation curves have been derived by interactively fitting model data cubes to the observed cubes. This procedure takes the rotation curve shape, the H i distribution, the inclination, and the size of the beam into account, and makes it possible to correct for the effects of beam smearing. A comparison with higher spatial resolution Hα rotation curves available in the literature shows that there is general agreement between the two. The late-type dwarf galaxies in our sample have rotation-curve shapes that are similar to those of late-type spiral galaxies, in the sense that their rotation curves, when expressed in units of disk scale lengths, rise as steeply in the inner parts and start to flatten at two disk scale lengths. None of the galaxies in our sample have solid-body rotation curves that extend beyond three disk scale lengths. The logarithmic slopes between two disk scale lengths and the last measured point on the rotation curve is similar between late-type dwarf and spiral galaxies. Thus, whether the flat part of the rotation curve is reached or not seems to depend more on the extent of the rotation curve than on its amplitude. We also find that the outer rotation curve shape does not strongly depend on luminosity, at least for galaxies fainter than MR ∼− 19. We find that in spiral galaxies and even in the central regions of late-type dwarf galaxies, the shape of the central distribution of light and the inner rise of the rotation curve are related. This implies that galaxies with stronger central concentrations of light also have higher central mass densities, and it suggests that the luminous mass dominates the gravitational potential in the central regions, even in low surface brightness dwarf galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c252c225c219e9f9e02d3f195253afbe31c2937

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Carlos S. Frenk
  2. Volker Springel
  3. Simon D. M. White
  4. Joop Schaye
  5. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  6. Robert A. Crain
  7. Tom Theuns
  8. P. Hopkins

In Instrumentation

  1. Carlos S. Frenk
  2. Joop Schaye
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  6. Robert A. Crain
  7. Tom Theuns
  8. P. Hopkins

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. F. Lelli
  2. Carlos S. Frenk
  3. J. Schombert
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. S. McGaugh
  6. Tom Theuns
  7. G. Yepes
  8. S. Gottlober

Citations in the corpus