Neural Domain Adaptation for Biomedical Question Answering

By Georg Wiese, Dirk Weissenborn, Mariana Neves. 2017

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Factoid question answering (QA) has recently benefited from the development of deep learning (DL) systems. Neural network models outperform traditional approaches in domains where large datasets exist, such as SQuAD (ca. 100,000 questions) for Wikipedia articles. However, these systems have not yet been applied to QA in more specific domains, such as biomedicine, because datasets are generally too small to train a DL system from scratch. For example, the BioASQ dataset for biomedical QA comprises less then 900 factoid (single answer) and list (multiple answers) QA instances. In this work, we adapt a neural QA system trained on a large open-domain dataset (SQuAD, source) to a biomedical dataset (BioASQ, target) by employing various transfer learning techniques. Our network architecture is based on a state-of-the-art QA system, extended with biomedical word embeddings and a novel mechanism to answer list questions. In contrast to existing biomedical QA systems, our system does not rely on domain-specific ontologies, parsers or entity taggers, which are expensive to create. Despite this fact, our systems achieve state-of-the-art results on factoid questions and competitive results on list questions.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Yejin Choi
  3. Jianfeng Gao
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. Kyunghyun Cho
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Graham Neubig
  8. Hannaneh Hajishirzi

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Jianfeng Gao
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Yejin Choi
  8. Cordelia Schmid

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Yejin Choi
  3. Jianfeng Gao
  4. Kyunghyun Cho
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Graham Neubig
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Iryna Gurevych

Citations in the corpus