Cladistic analysis and a revised classification of fossil and recent mysticetes

By M. Steeman. 2007

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bef6af73689259f8c32209e79453fb3280cf44a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Friedman
2. Michael Benton
3. T. Near
4. P. Donoghue
5. F. G. Marx

In Paleontology

1. M. Friedman
2. Michael Benton
3. T. Near
4. P. Donoghue
5. J. Vinther
6. R. Asher
7. F. G. Marx
8. M. Ezcurra

Citations in the corpus

• Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history (2015, background): “Phylogenetic analysis of living and fossil mysticetes (Steeman, 2007) shows that Llanocetus is the closest relative of the toothless mysticetes (Chaeomysticeti Mitchell, 1989), based on two apomorphies: the premaxilla is straight in lateral view (not abruptly depressed anterior to nasals), and the o”
• The More the Merrier? A Large Cladistic Analysis of Mysticetes, and Comments on the Transition from Teeth to Baleen (2011, methodology): “43); 9) zygomatic processes that do not extend anteriorly (Steeman 2007: char.”