Evidence for reversible control of magnetization in a ferromagnetic material by means of spin–orbit magnetic field
By A. Chernyshov, M. Overby, X. Liu, J. K. Furdyna, Y. Lyanda-Geller, Leonid P. Rokhinson. 2008
487 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The magnetization of a magnetic random-access memory is usually controlled by the injection of an externally polarized spin-current. A proof-of-principle demonstration shows that this could instead be manipulated with local fields generated by spin–orbit interactions of an unpolarized current.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4beb16e1f9f9c3205436f4fc441527db9f5f124d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
In Materials Chemistry
Citations in the corpus
- Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems (2018, background): “…focus of the present section is to discuss the experiments performed on bulk non-centrosymmetric magnets, including dilute magnetic semiconductors (Chernyshov et al., 2009; Endo et al., 2010; Fang et al., 2011; Kurebayashi et al., 2014), magnetic half-heusler compounds (Ciccarelli et al., 2016)…”
- Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: Physics and spintronic structures (2013, background): “27), can serve to rotate magnetization by 90o (Chernyshov et al., 2009) or even by 180o (Endo et al., 2010b) in (Ga,Mn)As films.”
- Antiferromagnetic spintronics (2016, background): “…(Miron et al., 2010) in transition metals, as well as in noncentrosymmetric magnetic semiconductors [(Ga,Mn)As, (Ga,Mn)(As,P), and (Ni, Mn)Sb] (Chernyshov et al., 2009; Fang et al., 2011; Kurebayashi et al., 2014; Ciccarelli et al., 2016) have attracted much attention in the past five years,…”
- Magnetization oscillations and waves driven by pure spin currents (2016, methodology): “Several physical mechanisms have been utilized to create pure spin currents, including the spin-Hall effect (SHE) [37–40], the nonlocal spin injection (NLSI) [41–43], the spin Seebeck effect [44,45], and the inverse spin galvanic effect [46,47].”
- Spin-dependent phenomena and device concepts explored in (Ga,Mn)As (2013, background): “Because of this specific form of the asymmetric non-equilibrium charge redistribution with a conserved total number of carriers, the current induced SOT requires broken inversion symmetry terms in Hso (Chernyshov et al., 2009; Fang et al., 2011; Garate and MacDonald, 2010; Manchon and Zhang, 2008, 2”
- Interface-Induced Phenomena in Magnetism (2016, unknown): “A spin torque arising from spin-orbit interactions has been demonstrated in GaMnAs [Chernyshov et al., 2009] and other ferromagnets [e.”
- Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. (2012, background): “where the spin precession is manipulated by the electric field, as well as the spin-galvanic effect, that is, the current-induced spin polarization or the current control of the magnetizatio”
- New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling. (2015, background): “This torque was first observed in (Ga,Mn)As [65] where straining the zinc-blende structure is responsible for the emergence of p-linear Dresselhaus SO coupling.”