Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience

By Christopher William Zobel. Decision Support Systems, 2011

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The future of risk assessment (2018, background): “systems [164,186], telecommunication systems [142], urban infrastructures [84,13], disaster analysis for avoidance and recovery [36,181,231].”
Network resilience (2020, methodology): “Zobel [121] also proposed similar resilience definition based on “resilience triangle” (Fig.”
Resilience-based network component importance measures (2013, background): “1 considers vulnerability as the study of the adverse effect on system performance caused by event e [9,36,23,38], similar in concept to “robustness” in “resilience triangle” literature in civil infrastructure [5,39].”
Resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems: With a focus on joint restoration modeling and analysis (2015, background): “The difference between this metric and other resilience metrics in the literature, such as the loss of resilience quantified as the area between the targeted performance curve and the real performance curve within the restoration period [13-14], a normalized shaded area underneath the performance cu”