Value at Risk Models in Finance

By Robert F. Engle, Simone Manganelli. Social Science Research Network, 2001

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The main objective of this paper is to survey and evaluate the performance of the most popular univariate VaR methodologies, paying particular attention to their underlying assumptions and to their logical flaws. In the process, we show that the Historical Simulation method and its variants can be considered as special cases of the CAViaR framework developed by Engle and Manganelli (1999). We also provide two original methodological contributions. The first one introduces the extreme value theory into the CAViaR model. The second one concerns the estimation of the expected shortfall (the expected loss, given that the return exceeded the VaR) using a regression technique. The performance of the models surveyed in the paper is evaluated using a Monte Carlo simulation. We generate data using GARCH processes with different distributions and compare the estimated quantiles to the true ones. The results show that CAViaR models perform best with heavy-tailed DGP. JEL Classification: C22, G22

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bcebd5f65f856f255a62c28a3024bc8f0e82cb1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Marco Rocco
  2. Richard Gerlach
  3. N. Y. Chan
  4. Cathy W. S. Chen
  5. James W. Taylor
  6. Pierre Pinson
  7. K. F. Chan
  8. P. Gray

In Finance

  1. Marco Rocco
  2. Richard Gerlach
  3. N. Y. Chan
  4. Cathy W. S. Chen
  5. James W. Taylor
  6. Pierre Pinson
  7. K. F. Chan
  8. P. Gray

Citations in the corpus