Efficient Replica Maintenance for Distributed Storage Systems
By Byung-Gon Chun, Frank Dabek, Andreas Haeberlen, Emil Sit, Hakim Weatherspoon, M. Frans Kaashoek, John D. Kubiatowicz, Robert Morris. Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2006
315 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bc5fcfb107a70ccb2b32c5e671a2e26d00bbdab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Dimakis
- Cheng Huang
- Kannan Ramchandran
- Osama Khan
- Giuseppe Ateniese
- Randal C. Burns
- Huseyin Simitci
- Reza Curtmola
Citations in the corpus
- MR-PDP: Multiple-Replica Provable Data Possession (2008, background): “Distributed storage systems that perform replica maintenance often have storage sites cross-check the contents of replicas through content hashing [10, 20].”
- Erasure Coding in Windows Azure Storage (2012, background): “The model is flexible to consider both independent or correlated failures [10, 32, 33, 34].”
- RACS: a case for cloud storage diversity (2010, methodology): “Peer-to-peer storage [19–21, 32] have employed RAID-like techniques to ensure the availability and durability of data.”
- Availability in Globally Distributed Storage Systems (2010, background): “For these reasons, GFS typically waits 15 minutes before commencing recovery of data on unavailable nodes.”
- Network Coding for Distributed Storage Systems (2007, background): “Most designs [2], [27], [5] can avoid reacting to node joins.”