Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia.
By A. Moss, M. Bourke, S. Williams, L. Hourigan, G. Brown, W. Tam, Rajvinder Singh, S. Zanati, Robert Y Chen, K. Byth. Gastroenterology, 2011
616 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gastroenterology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bac884cffb9e4824b9ef1fba560ce2dfdb14f8f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Oncology
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline (2015, positive): “Nonetheless, piecemeal EMR is still considered to be the treatment of choice for the majority of these large colorectal lesions, with recent data showing excellent early and long-term outcomes [181 – 183].”
- Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline (2017, methodology): “Difficult access was associated with failed endoscopic resection in the ACE study [4] (OR 2.”
- Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy (2015, background): “Many sessile polyps O2 cm in size are removable endoscopically, depending on their location within the colon, their size, and the ability to access them endoscopically.(139,140) Endoscopic resection is more cost effective and safer than surgical resection.”