A Meta-Analysis of the Yield of Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Other Diagnostic Modalities in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

By Stuart L. Triester, J. Leighton, G. Leontiadis, D. Fleischer, A. Hara, R. Heigh, A. D. Shiff, Virender K. Sharma. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005

690 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gastroenterology, Oncology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4baa3158e409724d7dc263dc0965bf97a5c1bb05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gastroenterology

1. Vladimir I. Iglovikov
2. Alexey A. Shvets
3. A. Ben Hamza
4. Hasib Zunair
5. Alexander V. Buslaev

In Oncology

1. A. Ben Hamza
2. Hasib Zunair

In Surgery

1. Vladimir I. Iglovikov
2. Alexey A. Shvets
3. Alexander V. Buslaev

Citations in the corpus

• Angiodysplasia Detection and Localization Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (2018, background): “…in the context of GI bleeding as it is safe, acceptable and has significantly higher or at least equivalent yield for lesions when compared with other, more invasive modalities like push enteroscopy, mesenteric angiography and intraoperative enteroscopy (Triester et al., 2005; Marmo et al., 2005).”