A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi.
By Jason D. Hoeksema, V. Chaudhary, C. Gehring, Nancy Collins Johnson, Justine Karst, R. Koide, Anne Pringle, Catherine Zabinski, James D. Bever, John C. Moore and 3 more. Ecology Letters, 2010
1,115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b96b1962783f19ef8ac7ef137f5e062f31e4aed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- W. H. van der Putten
- J. Klironomos
- Matthias C. Rillig
- K. Treseder
- Taraneh M. Emam
- Sarah E. Smith
- James D. Bever
- Leho Tedersoo
In Plant Science
- Matthias C. Rillig
- W. H. van der Putten
- F. Andrew Smith
- James D. Bever
- K. Treseder
- Sarah E. Smith
- J. Jansa
- Taraneh M. Emam
Citations in the corpus
- Microplastic fiber and drought effects on plants and soil are only slightly modified by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2020, background): “Depending on the context, AM fungi are known for their biomass promoting potential (e.g., Hoeksema et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2010).”
- The interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil phosphorus availability influences plant community productivity and ecosystem stability (2014, background): “For example, when phosphorus (P) is scarce, plants often benefit from AMF–plant symbiosis, and AMF increase plant growth (Hoeksema et al. 2010), but when P is abundant, plants may receive little or no benefit from AMF, and AMF may therefore reduce plant growth (Johnson, Graham & Smith 1997; Johnson ”
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition: A trait‐based predictive framework (2018, background): “Since AMF genera associated with higher N availabilities also tended to contribute less to host plant P, this mechanism might explain why AMF inoculation does not generally improve plant growth when N fertilizer has been added, as reported in the meta- analysis of Hoeksema et al. (2010).”
- Local soil, but not commercial AMF inoculum, increases native and non‐native grass growth at a mine restoration site (2016, background): “In a meta-analysis of plant responses to AMF inoculation, inoculum “complexity” (e.g. potential diversity) was correlated with positive plant responses in laboratory settings (Hoeksema et al. 2010); therefore, the diversity of local soil relative to commercial products may improve plant benefits.”
- Direct and indirect effects of climate change on soil microbial and soil microbial‐plant interactions: What lies ahead? (2015, background): “Variation in microbial community composition through the soil profile can affect microbial interactions with plant roots (Hoeksema et al. 2010, Johnson et al. 2015), such as competition for nitrogen (Hodge et al. 2000, v www.esajournals.org 9 August 2015 v Volume 6(8) v Article 130 Bardgett et al.…”
- Microbially Mediated Plant Functional Traits (2011, background): “In the mycorrhizal symbiosis, a meta-analysis shows that inoculation with a soil bacterial pool enhances the amount of benefit that the plant obtains from the fungus (Hoeksema et al., 2010; see Chapter 4).”
- Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth depend on root system: a meta-analysis (2014, methodology): “Previous meta-analysis studies only randomly selected a small subset of all satisfied publications for further analysis (Hoeksema et al. 2010; Veresoglou et al. 2012).”
- Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Plant Growth and Performance: Importance in Biotic and Abiotic Stressed Regulation (2020, background): “Depending on the stress, the benefits of AMF to plant partners can vary [64], and mycorrhizal fungal types vary in their responses to climate change.”
- Do native and invasive plants differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta‐analysis (2015, methodology): “This agrees with previous studies (Wilson & Hartnett 1998; Hoeksema et al. 2010) and could at least partly be driven by differences in root architecture, because fibrous roots associated with many grasses tend to have a lower AM fungal (a)”
- Multiple phosphorus acquisition strategies adopted by fine roots in low-fertility soils in Central Amazonia (2019, background): “…plant competition, soil microbial biota, soil depth, seasonality) and fungal hyphae properties (root colonisation rate, growth rate and nutrient-uptake capacity) have all been reported to influence AM colonization (Hoeksema et al. 2010; Johnson 2010; Li et al. 2017; Smith et al. 2011).”
- Plant defence theory re‐examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms (2011, background): “Although AMF are an integral part of roots, the benefit : cost ratio of the association can change dramatically depending on plant and fungal genotypes and environmental resource availability (Johnson, Graham& Smith 1997; Hoeksema et al. 2010).”