Comparison of infiltration models

By S. Mishra, J. Tyagi, Vijay P. Singh. 2003

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using adaptive neuro- fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) (2019, background): “The infiltration study based upon soil characteristics is important for agriculture (Haghighi et al. 2010; Rawls et al. 1993), and has attracted the attention of soil and water Scientists (Mishra et al. 2003; Swamee et al. 2014).”
Evaluation of infiltration models with different numbers of fitting parameters in different soil texture classes (2014, background): “Mishra et al. (2003) examined the suitability of the infiltration models with coefficient of efficiency.”
Evaluation of some infiltration models and hydraulic parameters (2010, background): “…of infiltration models should be tested under different conditions, because the various models can suppose different final infiltration rate values for a soil, which is not correct, while the final infiltration rate is generally a soil-dependent parameter (Singh, 1992; Mishra et al., 2003).”
Estimation and inter-comparison of infiltration models (2017, background): “Many researchers have compared the accuracy of the models by comparing the computed and observed infiltration rates (Hopmans, 1995; Mishra et al., 2003; Chahinian et al., 2005; Turner, 2006; Haghighi et al., 2010).”