Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general

By Zachary Estes, James S. Adelman. 2008

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b81d5b924eee32f1d93b3cccfdeb303aa26c9e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Mark Andrews
2. Lotte Meteyard
3. Gabriella Vigliocco
4. S. Kousta

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. S. Kousta
2. Gabriella Vigliocco
3. Mark Andrews
4. Lotte Meteyard
5. Mirella Lapata

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Mark Andrews
2. Lotte Meteyard
3. Gabriella Vigliocco
4. S. Kousta
5. Friedemann Pulvermüller
6. Alessandro Lenci
7. Markus Kiefer
8. Guy Dove

Citations in the corpus

• Toward a theory of semantic representation (2009, methodology): “…in terms of limited control of lexical and sublexical variables (as also shown by Larsen et al. 2006) or in terms of characteristics of the distribution of valence ratings (unimodal vs. bimodal) used in regression analyses (this is the case for the results reported by Estes and Adelman 2008).”