The Indispensability of Mathematics
By Mark Colyvan. 2001
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b4a5423ed68a0665bfb0f46a7e6b3c19d434c35
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Charles Chihara
- Marc Lange
- Mark Zelcer
- Aidan Lyon
- Robert W. Batterman
- Otávio A. S. Bueno
- Jeremy Butterfield
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Aidan Lyon
- Mark Zelcer
- Charles Chihara
- Marc Lange
- Robert W. Batterman
- Otávio A. S. Bueno
- Mark Colyvan
- Christopher Pincock
In History and Philosophy of Science
- Aidan Lyon
- Robert W. Batterman
- Marc Lange
- Charles Chihara
- Mark Zelcer
- Otávio A. S. Bueno
- Mark Colyvan
- Christopher Pincock
Citations in the corpus
- A Structural Account of Mathematics (2004, background): “Take an indispensabilist platonist such as Mark Colyvan.”
- On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science (2010, background): “[1, 12, 13] Some of these examples have been subject to criticism by Melia [18, 19].”
- Against Mathematical Explanation (2013, background): “(Colyvan 2001) for more on the former subject and (Steiner 1998) for discussion of the latter.”
- Mathematical Explanations Of Empirical Facts, And Mathematical Realism (2012, background): “[Colyvan 2001 : 50–1] ”
- What Are Mathematical Coincidences (and Why Does It Matter) (2010, background): “…that ‘if two different physical systems are governed by the same differential equation, it’s clear that there is some similarity between these systems, no matter how disparate the systems may seem … It seems plausible, at least, that this similarity is structural … ’ (Colyvan 2001, p. 83).”
- Logical Non-Apriorism and the 'Law' of Non-Contradiction (2004, background): “See also Colyvan (2001), chapter 6 for a defence of the view that mathematics is empirical.”