Impact of Streamflow Persistence on Hydrologic Design

By E. Douglas, Richard M. Vogel, Charles Kroll. 2001

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Ocean Engineering, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b3ce505734390edc766ae32688c46124a663770

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Volpi
2. F. Lombardo
3. J. Salas
4. A. Cancelliere
5. Demetris Koutsoyiannis
6. Vijay P. Singh
7. Aldo Fiori
8. Salvatore Grimaldi

In Ocean Engineering

1. Demetris Koutsoyiannis
2. Salvatore Grimaldi
3. E. Volpi
4. A. Cancelliere
5. Vijay P. Singh
6. M. Janga Reddy
7. Songbai Song

In Water Science and Technology

1. Demetris Koutsoyiannis
2. Salvatore Grimaldi
3. E. Volpi
4. F. Lombardo
5. Keith Beven

Citations in the corpus

• One hundred years of return period: Strengths and limitations (2015, background): “As mentioned in section 1, two different definitions of the return period are available in the hydrological literature [see, e.g., Fern andez and Salas, 1999a; Douglas et al., 2002].”
• An analytical formulation of return period of drought severity (2003, background): “An alternative definition of return period is the average number of trials required to the first occurrence of a critical event (e.g., Vogel, 1987; Bras, 1990; Douglas et al., 2002).”
• Drought length properties for periodic‐stochastic hydrologic data (2004, background): “Then Llamas and Siddiqui [1969] showed that under the iid hypothesis the probability distribution of run length is geometric.”