SECURITY OF HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION
By Melissa Chase, Hao Chen, Jintai Ding, Shafi Goldwasser, Sergey Gorbunov, Jeffrey Hoffstein, Kristin E. Lauter, Satyanarayana V. Lokam, Dustin Moody, T. Morrison and 2 more. 2017
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Hao Chen
- Kim Laine
- Zhicong Huang
- A. Al Badawi
- Praneeth Vepakomma
- M. Sadegh Riazi
- Shai Halevi
- Ramesh Raskar
Citations in the corpus
- A Review of Homomorphic Encryption Libraries for Secure Computation (2018, background): “Generation of such schemes continues to be an active area of research and development of standards for homomorphic encryption has recently taken-off as described in [20,21].”
- Labeled PSI from Fully Homomorphic Encryption with Malicious Security (2018, methodology): “2 We set the parameters to always achieve at least a 128-bit security level according to the recommendations provided in [11].”
- Simple Encrypted Arithmetic Library v2.3.0 (2017, methodology): “[17, 12, 1]) and the first draft of standardized (R)LWE parameter sets was proposed in [13].”
- Implementation and Performance Evaluation of RNS Variants of the BFV Homomorphic Encryption Scheme (2019, methodology): “Parameter Selection To choose the ring dimension n, we ran the Learning With Errors security estimator4 (commit f59326c) [6] to find the lowest security levels for the uSVP, decoding, and dual attacks following the standard homomorphic encryption security recommendations [11].”
- An Improved RNS Variant of the BFV Homomorphic Encryption Scheme (2019, methodology): “We set the Gaussian distribution parameter σ to 8/ √ 2π [7], the error bound Be to 6σ, and the lower bound for p to 2tnq.”