Meridian: a lightweight network location service without virtual coordinates

By Bernard Wong, Aleksandrs Slivkins, Emin Gün Sirer. Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, 2005

442 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b3169c5c5e1cc60247bba1f7a5781340fd00335

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Jennifer Rexford
2. N. Feamster
3. Arvind Krishnamurthy
4. Harsha V. Madhyastha
5. T. Anderson
6. Larry L. Peterson
7. Arun Venkataramani
8. Margo I. Seltzer

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Arvind Krishnamurthy
2. Margo I. Seltzer
3. Jonathan Ledlie
4. Paul Gardner

Citations in the corpus

• Network Coordinates in the Wild (2007, methodology): “Although network coordinates have attractive properties for latency prediction on the Internet, they have been criticized for requiring expensive maintenance and having prediction accuracy significantly worse than direct measurement methods such as Meridian [29].”
• In VINI veritas: realistic and controlled network experimentation (2006, methodology): “For instance, there have already been a few transport protocols in deployment such as RTP, RTSP, SCTP, UDP-Lite, and people have also been implementing congestion control in the application layer.”
• iPlane: an information plane for distributed services (2006, methodology): “To address this, several research efforts, such as IDMaps [15], GNP [34], Vivaldi [11], Meridian [54], and PlanetSeer [55] have investigated providing a com­mon measurement infrastructure for distributed applica­tions.”