Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth? And Who Gains and Loses from It?

By Masahisa Fujita, Jacques-François Thisse. 2003

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b21c736dee109c86ade8bc6b63b3c5d61b8a687

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications (2019, unknown): “As a consequence, even those who stay put in the periphery are better off than under dispersion, provided that the growth effect triggered by the agglomeration is strong enough” (Fujita and Thisse, 2003: 121).”
What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature (2006, background): “Closely related influences that counteract incentives to cluster productive facilities, such as trade costs (F ujita and T hisse , 2002 ), also need to be recognized.”
Globalization and the evolution of the supply chain: who gains and who loses ? (2006, background): “ρ i ∈ Mrr ( 11 ) Similarly, the profi to f afirm i ∈ Mrs with r 6= s is as follows:”
Frontiers of the New Economic Geography (2005, methodology): “To illustrate the typical approach in these models, we briefly summarize below the work by Fujita and Thisse[66].”
Both Marshall and Jacobs were Right! (2016, background): “through 6(7) in 1990 in terms of labor force specialization (labor share in each industry), in line with the original Glaeser et al. (1992) approach.”
Big or Small Cities? On city size and economic growth (2017, unknown): “The conclusion of these theoretical exercises tends to be that more agglomeration of people and firms and thus larger cities, increase people’s and companies productivity and is, hence, tantamount to greater economic growth (Fujita and Thisse 2003; Martin and Ottaviano 2001).”