Security and Privacy for Implantable Medical Devices

By Daniel Halperin, Thomas S. Benjamin, Kevin Fu, Tadayoshi Kohno, W. Maisel. 2008

444 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Mechanical Engineering, Media Technology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Mechanical Engineering

Benjamin Ransford

In Media Technology

Citations in the corpus

NoPeek: Information leakage reduction to share activations in distributed deep learning (2020, neutral): “[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9].”
Data security and privacy in wireless body area networks (2010, background): “Conflict between security and safety: Whether the data can be accessed whenever needed could be a matter of patients’ safety [ 2 ].”
Hijacking an insulin pump: Security attacks and defenses for a diabetes therapy system (2011, background): “A survey article [11] reviews the security and privacy issues for implantable medical devices.”
Challenges and Research Directions in Medical Cyber–Physical Systems (2012, background): “Recent years have seen the issue of medical device security addressed for different classes of medical devices such as implantable [19], [27] or interoperable devices [65].”
Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare (2012, methodology): “outsiders observe presence and type of sensors on patient [Halperin et al. 2008b]”
Cyber-Physical Systems Security—A Survey (2017, background): “Halperin et al. [57] initiated the discussion of the security goals in medical devices by extending the standard security goals, conﬁdentiality, integrity, and availability.”
Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies (2010, background): “There are inherent trade-offs among security, availability, and utility goals [9].”
Internet of Medical Things: A Review of Recent Contributions Dealing With Cyber-Physical Systems in Medicine (2018, unknown): “The concern is greatly ampliﬁed when it comes to implantable medical devices because they usually assure vital function and any tampering could have disastrous consequences [43], [44].”
R EDUCING LEAKAGE IN DISTRIBUTED DEEP LEARNING FOR SENSITIVE HEALTH DATA (2019, background): “1 INTRODUCTION Data sharing and computation with security, privacy and safety have been identified amongst most important current trends in healthcare (Stanford, 2018; Avancha et al., 2012; Halperin et al., 2008).”
Ensuring Safety, Security, and Sustainability of Mission-Critical Cyber–Physical Systems (2012, background): “A case in point is the attack on pacemakers which not only forced them to reveal a patient’s electrocardiogram (EKG) data but also actuate an untimely shock [23].”
The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers (2016, background): “This resonates with similar problems observed in wireless digital pacemakers and glucose pumps, which were vulnerable to cyber-attacks in the past [50,51].”
They can hear your heartbeats: non-invasive security for implantable medical devices (2011, background): “Categories and Subject Descriptors C.2.2 [Computer Systems Organization]: Computer-Communications Networks General Terms Algorithms, Design, Performance, Security Keywords Full-duplex, Implanted Medical Devices, Wireless”
Security Issues in Healthcare Applications Using Wireless Medical Sensor Networks: A Survey (2011, background): “There are other survey studies on security and privacy issues in wireless healthcare applications [8,33-36 ,”
Cyber-physical systems security: Limitations, issues and future trends (2020, unknown): “• Disclosure of Information: Hackers can disclose any private/personal information through the interception of communication trafﬁc using wireless hacking tools [16], violating both privacy and conﬁdentiality [79].”