Apparent fluid slip at hydrophobic microchannel walls

By D. Tretheway, C. Meinhart. 2002

1,001 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b1604ceec5cf4ecde54dd2cde96166ef699ad23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

The lattice Boltzmann method for isothermal micro-gaseous flow and its application in shale gas flow: a review (2015, background): “The non-slip assumption, however, is broken down at microand nanoscales as many researchers have investigated the fluid/gas phenomenon[83][84].”
Slip at Fluid-Solid Interface (2011, background): “153], optical photography [101, 106], evanescent-wave-induced fluorescence combined with fringe pattern fluorescence recovery [49], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging [171–173], near field laser velocimetry [21, 39, 70], total internal reflection-fluorescence recovery [24, 84], high-speed cine”
Lattice Boltzmann method for microfluidics: models and applications (2011, background): “boundary slip has also been well observed with various experimental technologies (Tretheway and Meinhart 2002; Zhu and Granick 2002).”
Transition from laminar to turbulent flow in liquid filled microtubes (2004, background): “For hydrophilic boundaries, closer investigations at the wall suggest that the no-slip boundary condition is valid (Trethway and Meinhart 2002), but even if the wall material is hydrophobic, the slip length is less than 1 lm and the effect of this conservative estimate of slip length on flow resista”
Momentum and Heat Transfer in a Laminar Boundary Layer with Slip Flow (2006, background): “Although experimental measurements [5] suggest that the slip length for hydrophobic surfaces with water are on the order of 1 m, the existence of liquid slip, aswell as the appropriate length scales for , is still the subject of controversy within the fluid mechanics community [6].”
Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale (2005, methodology): “…et al., 2003 and through nanopores Cheikh and Koper, 2003 , fluid velocity profiles were measured using micron-resolution particle image velocimetry Tretheway and Meinhart, 2002 , double-focus fluorescence cross correlation Lumma et al., 2003 , and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching Pit…”