Agricultural Biotechnology's Complementary Intellectual Assets
By G. Graff, Gordon C. Rausser, Arthur A. Small. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2003
156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4afa4c06ecb9085150fd94f826a538c5c421856d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Russell J. Funk
- Jason Owen-Smith
- Carlos J. Serrano
- Steven Casper
- Walter W. Powell
- James A. Evans
- H. Bathelt
- S. Jong
Citations in the corpus
- Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms (2004, unknown): “Others raise similar concerns about the effects of dense “thickets” of overlapping patent claims, but predict that firms will “navigate” through these thickets by devising institutional solutions such as patent pools or joint ventures (Merges 2001, Shapiro 2001), or by acquiring firms with blocking ”
- A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change (2017, background): “Genetically engineered seeds increase the value of the earlier patented chemical and biological technologies by broadening potential application areas and excluding competitors (Graff et al. 2003, Pollack 2009).”
- Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide (2012, unknown): “This research has shown that these changes to market structure have been motivated by a need to combine complementary technology assets such as core germplasm, GM traits, and research tools (Graff et al., 2003); the desire to acquire greater depth within a particular technological area (King and Sch”
- The Dynamics of the Transfer and Renewal of Patents (2008, background): “7 Our paper also relates to the industrial organization literature on business transfers and exit, mergers, and reallocation (Dunne, Roberts, and Samuelson [12]; Pakes and Ericson [39]; Holmes and Schmitz [24]; Mitchell and Mulherin [34]; Andrade and Stafford [4]; Graff, Rausser and Small [ 17 ]; Ma”