The JRC-EU-TIMES model - Assessing the long-term role of the SET Plan Energy technologies

By G. C. Sofia, Nijs Wouter, R. Pablo, Sgobbi Alessandra, Radu Daniela, Bolat Pelin, Thiel Christian, P. Efstathios. 2013

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Pareto-optimal temporal aggregation of energy system models (2021, unknown): “… Domínguez-Muñoz et al. [15] 2011  Ortiga et al. [65] 2011  Devogelaer et al. [66] 2012  De Sisternes et al. [67, 68] 2013/16  Simões et al. [69] 2013  Voll et al. [70] 2013  Fazlollahi et al. [9, 71] 2014  Green et al. [17] 2014  Poncelet et al. [72, 73] 2014/16  Stadler et al. [74]…”
Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment (2016, methodology): “7 €/MW h and 121 €/MW h in years 2025 and 2030, respectively [55].”
The impact of the EU car CO2 regulation on the energy system and the role of electro-mobility to achieve transport decarbonisation (2016, methodology): “Different to Simoes et al. (2013), we have disaggregated the car”
The role of the discount rates in energy systems optimisation models (2016, methodology): “36 17 Furthermore, results from Figure 3 are in line with those obtained by Simões et al. [23] 1 using the JRC-EU-TIMES model for EU28.”