Conservation and the genetics of populations

By F. Allendorf, Gordon Luikart. 2006

2,065 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ae9c98d27e62a95d23114bff2377a4cee5621f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Contribution of genetics and genomics to seagrass biology and conservation (2007, background): “It also requires us to include the genetic component in the discussion about conservation and mitigation (Allendorf and Luikart, 2007; Schwartz et al., 2007).”
Genomics of Origin, Domestication and Evolution of Phaseolus vulgaris (2014, methodology): “Evolutionary novelty can result either from a combination of different traits from both of the parents, or from traits in a hybrid that transgresses the parental phenotypes (transgressive segregation) (Allendorf and Luikart 2007).”
Hybridization and the species problem in conservation (2015, background): “This might happen rapidly for highly advantageous introduced alleles (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010) or slowly by chance alone (Allendorf et al., 2013).”
Molecular markers for biodiversity analysis of wildlife animals: a brief review (2009, background): “Conservation genetics or the application of genetics to the preservation of species has received increas� ing attention in recent years (Allendorf & Luikart, 2007; Frankham, 2003).”
Relationships among levels of biodiversity and the relevance of intraspecific diversity in conservation - a project synopsis (2008, background): “Although Lande (1988) argued that demographic factors were more important than genetic ones in determining the shortterm persistence of populations, it is now accepted that demographic and genetic processes often act synergistically (Allendorf and Luikart, 2007).”
Global warming will affect the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Lycaena helle populations (2011, background): “Meanwhile, neutral and nonneutral, dominant and codominant markers offer a broad choice of ways of analysing different temporal and spatial scales in the fields of phylogeography, ecology and conservation (Allendorf & Luikart, 2007).”
Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees (2011, methodology): “PCR was carried out using the oligonucleotide primers 1061f (16), 228r, 530f, r (17), SSUres-f1/r1 (18), 18f, 1492r, and 1047r (19) to amplify portions of the small subunit, large subunit, or internal transcribed spacer regions of the ribosomal RNA.”
Management of genetic diversity of subdivided populations in conservation programmes (2010, background): “tions in reduced and sometimes isolated groups, has an impact on the erosion of genetic variation and the increase in inbreeding, factors of paramount importance in conservation programmes (Frankham et al. 2002; Allendorf and Luikart 2007).”
Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs (2008, background): “The evidence from fish is extensive and reveals highly deleterious effects (Allendorf & Luikart 2006).”
What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? (2010, background): “In random mating population with stable population size, approximately 12% of all individuals are expected not to contribute any progeny to the next generation (Allendorf & Luikart 2007, p. 153).”
The population decline of the New Zealand sea lion Phocarctos hookeri: a review of possible causes (2011, background): “Mammal Review © 2011 Mammal Society inbreeding (see Allendorf & Luikart 2007).”
Life-history traits and extrinsic threats determine extinction risk in New Zealand lizards (2013, background): “with small geographic ranges are typically at greater risk of extinction because they have small population sizes, rendering them particularly susceptible to demographic stochasticity, inbreeding, and localized threats and catastrophes (Allendorf and Luikart, 2007).”
Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population‐level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision‐making (2016, background): “For example, allelic richness, although less frequently used as a measure of genetic diversity, is more sensitive to population perturbation and can be a better indicator of population bottlenecks than HE (Lowe et al., 2005; Allendorf et al., 2013; Greenbaum et al., 2014).”
Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity (2012, background): “Fragmentation of populations that were once widely distributed results in small, isolated populations potentially subject to loss of genetic diversity, inbreeding depression and increased risk of extinction (see Allendorf and Luikart, 2006; Frankham et al., 2010).”
dartr: An r package to facilitate analysis of SNP data generated from reduced representation genome sequencing (2018, methodology): “Testing data for conformation to Hardy – Weinberg and gametic-phase disequilibrium expectations prior to analyses has been a cornerstone of population genetic analyses because many downstream analyses depend on those assumptions (Allendorf & Luikart, 2007; Hedrick, 2011).”