University Efficiency: A Comparison and Consolidation of Results from Stochastic and Non‐stochastic Methods

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios (2008, background): “For example, separate frontiers have been estimated for universities in Canada (McMillan and Chan 2004), Australia (Worthington and Lee 2005) and the United Kingdom (Glass et al. 1995), and for bank branches in South Africa (O’Donnell and van der Westhuizen 2002) and Spain (Lovell and Pastor 1997).”
Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward (2017, unknown): “Community variables Competition (Herfindahl index/number of faculties within X km) McMillan and Datta (1998), McMillan and Chan (2006), Naper (2010), Agasisti (2011a), Haelermans and Blank (2012), Haelermans et al (2012), Misra et al (2012).”
Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: the case of Italian and Spanish state universities (2010, methodology): “Furthermore, they adopted a different methodology, the random parameter model, which is a parametric technique; the difficulty in comparing results derived from different sources is well-known (e.g., McMillan and Chan 2006 ), and future research will address this point specifically.”