Geometric quantum computation using nuclear magnetic resonance
By Jonathan A. Jones, Vlatko Vedral, A. Ekert, G. Castagnoli. Nature, 2000
589 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Spectroscopy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ad85270adda971edb25d1035b3fe21293ea01a3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Andrew M. Childs
- Julia Kempe
- Eliahu Cohen
- Seth Lloyd
- Wim van Dam
- Oded Regev
- Simon C. Benjamin
- Dorit Aharonov
Citations in the corpus
- Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation (2004, background): “It is a crucial ingredient in topological (and later, geometrical) quantum computation [ 18 ,23,27].”
- Optical holonomic single quantum gates with a geometric spin under a zero field (2017, unknown): “(1), (8) and (9) onto the qubit space |±1⟩.”
- Geometric phase from Aharonov–Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond (2019, background): “ndom matrix theory (190) for disordered systems. Finally, we wish to mention the promising role of geometric phase and in particular non-Abelian geometric phase in quantum information and computation (191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199). Implementations of quantum gates based on the geometric phase”
- Bang–bang control of fullerene qubits using ultrafast phase gates (2006, background): “This kind of error cancellation is analogous to the 90◦y 180 ◦ x 90 ◦ y type of pulse correction NMR [23, 24].”