Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective?

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set (2006, background): “…if the object has a ‘‘chip’’ in the left or right side), the dimensional effects can be weak while feature priming effects remain intact (see Kumada, 2001; Theeuwes et al., 2006 this issue; but see Müller & Krummenacher, 2006 this issue; Pollmann, Weidner, Müller, & von Cramon, 2006 this issue).”
Reward has a residual impact on target selection in visual search, but not on the suppression of distractors (2011, background): “One account for this relationship between dimension priming and response priming is that the cognitive system may be optimized to change both parameters at the same time (Kingstone, 1992; Mueller & Krummenacher, 2006).”
Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. (2010, background): “, Müller et al., 2003; Wolfe, 1994) then providing information about the upcoming target should improve visual search. In other words, if we tell observers that the upcoming target is a red color singleton then observers should be faster when the target is indeed a red singleton then when it is a gr”