Effect of Dengue Serostatus on Dengue Vaccine Safety and Efficacy
By S. Sridhar, Alexander Luedtke, E. Langevin, M. Zhu, M. Bonaparte, Tifany Machabert, S. Savarino, B. Zambrano, A. Moureau, A. Khromava and 13 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
661 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Background In efficacy trials of a tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD‐TDV), excess hospitalizations for dengue were observed among vaccine recipients 2 to 5 years of age. Precise risk estimates according to observed dengue serostatus could not be ascertained because of the limited numbers of samples collected at baseline. We developed a dengue anti–nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) IgG enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and used samples from month 13 to infer serostatus for a post hoc analysis of safety and efficacy. Methods In a case–cohort study, we reanalyzed data from three efficacy trials. For the principal analyses, we used baseline serostatus determined on the basis of measured (when baseline values were available) or imputed (when baseline values were missing) titers from a 50% plaque‐reduction neutralization test (PRNT50), with imputation conducted with the use of covariates that included the month 13 anti‐NS1 assay results. The risk of hospitalization for virologically confirmed dengue (VCD), of severe VCD, and of symptomatic VCD according to dengue serostatus was estimated by weighted Cox regression and targeted minimum loss–based estimation. Results Among dengue‐seronegative participants 2 to 16 years of age, the cumulative 5‐year incidence of hospitalization for VCD was 3.06% among vaccine recipients and 1.87% among controls, with a hazard ratio (vaccine vs. control) through data cutoff of 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 2.70). Among dengue‐seronegative participants 9 to 16 years of age, the cumulative incidence of hospitalization for VCD was 1.57% among vaccine recipients and 1.09% among controls, with a hazard ratio of 1.41 (95% CI, 0.74 to 2.68). Similar trends toward a higher risk among seronegative vaccine recipients than among seronegative controls were also found for severe VCD. Among dengue‐seropositive participants 2 to 16 years of age and those 9 to 16 years of age, the cumulative incidence of hospitalization for VCD was 0.75% and 0.38%, respectively, among vaccine recipients and 2.47% and 1.88% among controls, with hazard ratios of 0.32 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.45) and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.31). The risk of severe VCD was also lower among seropositive vaccine recipients than among seropositive controls. Conclusions CYD‐TDV protected against severe VCD and hospitalization for VCD for 5 years in persons who had exposure to dengue before vaccination, and there was evidence of a higher risk of these outcomes in vaccinated persons who had not been exposed to dengue. (Funded by Sanofi Pasteur; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00842530, NCT01983553, NCT01373281, and NCT01374516.)
Subfields: Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ac2fabf2890d10220e786797cae69e613476e02
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- The importance of vector control for the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases (2020, background): “Moreover, for some diseases, such as dengue (a vaccine is licensed but is not widely used due to safety concerns [10]), chikungunya, Zika, and West Nile disease, vector control is currently the only method available to protect populations.”