Early results from the Whisper instrument on Cluster: an overview

By P. Décréau, P. Fergeau, V. Krasnoselskikh, E. Guirriec, M. Lévêque, P. Martin, O. Randriamboarison, J. Rauch, F. Sene, H. Séran and 14 more. 2001

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract. The Whisper instrument yields two data sets: (i) the electron density determined via the relaxation sounder, and (ii) the spectrum of natural plasma emissions in the frequency band 2–80 kHz. Both data sets allow for the three-dimensional exploration of the magnetosphere by the Cluster mission. The total electron density can be derived unambiguously by the sounder in most magnetospheric regions, provided it is in the range of 0.25 to 80 cm-3 . The natural emissions already observed by earlier spacecraft are fairly well measured by the Whisper instrument, thanks to the digital technology which largely overcomes the limited telemetry allocation. The natural emissions are usually related to the plasma frequency, as identified by the sounder, and the combination of an active sounding operation and a passive survey operation provides a time resolution for the total density determination of 2.2 s in normal telemetry mode and 0.3 s in burst mode telemetry, respectively. Recorded on board the four spacecraft, the Whisper density data set forms a reference for other techniques measuring the electron population. We give examples of Whisper density data used to derive the vector gradient, and estimate the drift velocity of density structures. Wave observations are also of crucial interest for studying small-scale structures, as demonstrated in an example in the fore-shock region. Early results from the Whisper instrument are very encouraging, and demonstrate that the four-point Cluster measurements indeed bring a unique and completely novel view of the regions explored. Key words. Space plasma physics (instruments and techniques; discontinuities, general or miscellaneous)

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4abde2259606e489991ea908c88ad7f847852b85

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. J. Goldstein
  2. B. Sandel
  3. Mark B. Moldwin
  4. Bodo W. Reinisch
  5. Dennis L. Gallagher
  6. I. Dandouras
  7. J. Foster
  8. Dieter Bilitza

In Molecular Biology

  1. Bodo W. Reinisch
  2. Mark B. Moldwin
  3. J. Goldstein
  4. Dennis L. Gallagher
  5. B. Sandel
  6. Y. Shprits
  7. Dieter Bilitza
  8. R. Thorne

Citations in the corpus