IN SEARCH OF FAIR SELECTION PROCEDURES

By R. Linn. 1976

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Ben Hutchinson
2. Margaret Mitchell
3. N. Dorans
4. Emily L. Denton
5. Xinlei Chen
6. Inioluwa Deborah Raji
7. Jiasen Lu
8. Zhe Gan

Citations in the corpus

• 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning (2018, background): “We agree with Linn’s [44] argument from 1976 that values encoded by technical definitions should be made explicit.”
• ETS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ITEM, TEST, AND SCORE FAIRNESS (2013, background): “Linn (1976) in his discussion of the Petersen and Novick (1976) analyses noted that the quest to achieve fair prediction is hampered by the fact that the criterion in many studies may itself be unfairly measured.”