What Maxwell Theory in D 4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance
By S. El-Showk, Y. Nakayama, S. Rychkov. 2011
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The free Maxwell theory in d ≠ 4 dimensions provides a physical example of a unitary, scale invariant theory which is NOT conformally invariant. The easiest way to see this is that the field strength operator F_(μν) is neither a primary nor a descendant. We show how conformal multiplets can be completed, and conformality restored, by adding new local operators to the theory. In d ≥ 5, this can only be done by sacrificing unitarity of the extended Hilbert space. We analyze the full symmetry structure of the extended theory, which turns out to be related to the OSp(d,2|2) superalgebra.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a92a981482206671009289932837ef8c086ca14
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Clay Córdova
- B. C. Rees
- S. Rychkov
- David Simmons-Duffin
- M. Paulos
- K. Intriligator
- T. Dumitrescu
- Tom Melia
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Operator bases, S-matrices, and their partition functions (2017, background): “See [53] for a related discussion concerning Maxwell theory outside four dimensions.”
- Deformations of superconformal theories (2016, background): “For instance, this happens on the Coulomb branches of maximally supersymmetric YangMills theories in d ≥ 5, because free vector fields in these dimensions are not conformally invariant (see for instance [63]).”
- Conformal invariance in the long-range Ising model (2015, background): “As is well known, such a vector theory without gauge invariance (“theory of elasticity”) is not conformally invariant [75, 53].”