Calibrated Bayes, an alternative inferential paradigm for official statistics
By Roderick J. A. Little. 2012
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a9253b78713c30fb350d56c3fd4b1c589452fce
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrew Gelman
- Christian Hennig
- Seth E. Spielman
- David C. Folch
- N. Nagle
- Aki Vehtari
- Jasper A. Vrugt
- Paul-Christian Burkner
Citations in the corpus
- Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey (2014, methodology): “Innovations in methodology are a relatively inexpensive way to improve the survey (see Ghosh & Rao, 1994; Little, 2012).”
- Beyond subjective and objective in statistics (2015, background): “…problems such as overconfidence (Alpert and Raiffa, 1984, Erev, Wallsten, and Budescu, 1994), which motivates efforts to check and calibrate Bayesian models (Rubin, 1984, Little, 2012) and to situate Bayesian inference within an error-statistical philosophy (Mayo, 1996, Gelman and Shalizi, 2013).”