The C∗-algebra of a minimal homeomorphism of zero mean dimension
By G. Elliott, Z. Niu. 2014
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Let $X$ be an infinite compact metrizable space, and let $\sigma: X\to X$ be a minimal homeomorphism. Suppose that $(X, \sigma)$ has zero mean topological dimension. The associated C*-algebra $A=\mathrm{C}(X)\rtimes_\sigma\mathbb Z$ is shown to absorb the Jiang-Su algebra $\mathcal Z$ tensorially, i.e., $A\cong A\otimes\mathcal Z$. This implies that $A$ is classifiable when $(X, \sigma)$ is uniquely ergodic. Moreover, without any assumption on the mean dimension, it is shown that $A\otimes A$ always absorbs the Jiang-Su algebra.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a34adcbfe5bc16ea3e3b40602d56a224e0324b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
In Mathematical Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Dynamic asymptotic dimension: relation to dynamics, topology, coarse geometry, and $$C^*$$C∗-algebras (2015, result): “We should note that there are many other results in the literature that give estimates on nuclear dimension or other C˚-algebraic regularity properties based on conditions on actions: see for example [36, 19, 37, 20, 11]. Many of these results go further than ours in at least some ways: for example,”
- Nuclear dimension and $$\mathcal Z$$Z-stability (2014, background): “In the uniquely ergodic case Elliott and Niu have shown that regularity is automatic [11] (a fact related to unique ergodicity implying mean dimension zero—regularity can fail for larger trace spaces).”
- Almost Finiteness and the Small Boundary Property (2018, background): “itions in the Toms–Winter conjecture are actually satisfied by all of the simple crossed products in the statement of Theorem 9.4. This is known to be the case when G = Zby the work of Elliott and Niu [13]. Remark 9.6. It is worth pointing out that the proof of Theorem 9.4 actually verifies a version ”
- Dimension, comparison, and almost finiteness (2017, methodology): “y and mean dimension are formally very different from either nuclear dimension or Z-stability and are more akin to slow dimension growth in inductive limit C∗-algebras, as demonstrated by the proof in [11], which employs arguments from an article of Toms on the equivalence of slow dimension growth an”